This essay was written in 1998. It recently received attention in Canberra. It has survived 12 years on the internet and is interesting that it is getting such high attention still. Obviously it is worth preserving. If it had not received attention, likely it would have been lost. The essay was originally written for a site run by a gentleman named Joe Larabell, who used to live in Tokyo. Joe wrote the editorial note below as he is the editor for his web site on which this site originally appeared. His editorial is also respectfully included as are links to what he was referring to when he wrote the editorial.
This
is Scientology for me [Ed.
Note: This article was submitted as a rebuttal to my own
Scientology page and is published here in the interest of
freedom of
speech. For further details on how this article came to be published on
an
otherwise "critical" site, kindly refer to the original
page] I
am a Scientologist. I came across the site of Mr. Joe Larabell. Joe's
experience in Scientology is different to mine. He left the Church in
its
earlier years, 1979. I joined the Church in 1986. Thus what we recall
of our
experiences is different. There
are some points of which I agree with Mr. Larabell. I especially
agree that people can get awfully emotional about subjects which
involve
belief. It does not matter if a person is a Scientologist, a Catholic,
a
Buddhist, a Hindu, a Muslem, a Shintoist or any other religion, or
ex-religion.
People can get awfully passionate about what they believe in. Scientology
is a body of knowledge developed by its founder Mr. L. Ron
Hubbard. Mr. Hubbard taught that while he may have developed
Scientology, he
credits great thinkers before him which provided great ideas. Such
great
philosophers would include Buddha for example, who developed a
philosophy that
perhaps in its original form, was very close to Scientology. And before
that,
the Veda, which according to Mr. Hubbard, is Scientology's "earliest
known
ancestor". The Dharma, is also referred to by Mr. Hubbard, meaning
knowingness. But while Mr. Hubbard does credit others where it is
relevant, and
there are modern writers amongst those he also credits, no earlier
person has
ever come close to totally freeing man. And Total Freedom is what
Scientology
offers, and it was developed by Mr. L. Ron Hubbard. Today
Scientology, like most organizations with similar worthwhile goals
for man, has evolved, grown and matured. There are now hundreds of
missions and
Churches around the world, and thousands of small groups. In my own
organization
in Tokyo we have 200 staff, and many staff outside of Tokyo. Those who
have
done services in Scientology in Tokyo alone number over 20,000. Mr.
Larabell says that there is a text that states to stamp out all
non-Scientology ways of thinking. There is no such text. However, in
Scientology, we are taught to solve Scientology problems with
Scientology
philosophy. Yet in writing this I must also add in all humility Mr.
Hubbard
clearly wrote the following, "Scientology is a workable system. This
does
not mean it is the best possible system or a perfect system. Remember
and use
that definition. Scientology is a workable system." Mr.
Larabell says that he worked inside the organization. I am not sure
how long that was for, but likely it was only for a relatively short
time. On
the other hand I have been employed by the Church since 1989. I have
never
experienced what Joe Larabell has claimed about the Church, and I have
been
employed in Australia, Japan and Asia, the USA, and Europe. I have
found that Scientology
has helped people, and helped me. Mr.
Larabell worked for an organization known as the Guardian's Office.
It was not run by the founder Mr. Hubbard. It was run by others. That
organization was, in its final days, found to be running not on the
policies
written by the founder, but rather, it was being run on policies
developed by
others. That of course raises the question, were the people in that
organization really Scientologists? They were not following the
policies of the
founder. They were not practicing Scientology. Needless to say the
Church
eventually closed down the Guardians Office. But this was some years
before I
came into Scientology. Thus
I need to point out that Mr. Joe Larabell possibly has his own
memory of experiences trapped in an organization that ceases to exist
today.
His memory of that organization ended for him in 1979, and the
organization
itself ceased altogether a few years later. Mr.
Larabell states that most of the current Church leadership is young.
While we have many young leaders, I am 47 years old, and the Executive
Director
of the Tokyo Organization is older than I am. And, some of our top
international executives are older than this. But youth is there too,
giving
both a young side with mature leadership. Also there are many leaders
within
our church that have successfully completed university education and
many more
who had prestigious careers before joining the Church. For example I
let go of
a very lucrative construction management career to become a Church
staff member.
The point I make here is that Church leadership is professional hands. Mr.
Larabell draws attention to what I might term a schism that occurred
in Scientology at around the time of the founder's death. Such schisms
are not
unusual in religion at such a time. Those who pick the wrong or losing
side of
any schism can have grievances. Some may even exaggerate those
grievances. And
this may be true for Scientology back then too. While I can understand
the
upset of those people who left, they have to realize themselves that
they were
the ones who made their decisions to leave. Further more, should they
wish, the
door into Scientology is always open for them to return. The door to
Scientology is never fully closed on anyone. That would be unfair. But
today the leadership of Scientology has helped the Church chart a
course on a very stable footing. Scientology has been expanding
dramatically.
In Los Angeles alone over 10,000 members attend Scientology events.
There are
almost a thousand prisons using Scientology criminal rehabilitation
technology
around the world. Mr. L. Ron Hubbard's educational books are now
approved for
school use in California. There are drug rehabilitation centers in six
continents that use Mr. Hubbard's technology. There are now around
20,000
Scientology staff and 8 million Scientologists world wide. World
expansion is what today's leadership is about. The book Dianetics,
the Modern Science of Mental Health, is now published in 52 languages.
In
Russia alone there are over forty missions, the largest of which has
hundreds
of staff. The whole of Eastern Europe is booming for Scientology too.
In Japan
the Tokyo organization has hundreds of staff and there are 21 City
Offices
outside of Tokyo. In the rest of Asia, there are many offices and
missions in
India, Nepal, Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, Hong Kong, Pakistan, and
more.
Scientology is growing fast. I know because I have personally been to
many of
these places pushing that expansion. As
to the state of the founder, which Mr. Larabell questions, I have met
several people who had worked with him. They all agree that Mr. Hubbard
was a
brilliant genius. He worked vigorously for the purpose of bettering
mankind.
What other man has worked out a way for enabling the intelligent, and
even the
no so intelligent, to become more able, to have higher IQs, and to
survive
better in today's world? Mr. Hubbard's works have now been honed and
polished
to put back together marriages, increase the survival of groups, better
the
treatment and education of children, and to further one's own survival
along
that route to immortality. This is the work of a brilliant
humanitarian. No
other organization can really do all that. As
to the workability of auditing, it works. This is my experience and
the experience of many others. I know of no other route to Total
Freedom. For
this I am indebted to Mr. Hubbard. And as to the upper level materials,
I have
done the real OT3. And I have successfully completed grades above that.
These
grades work like nothing I can explain on this page. Scientology
enables a person to recall their past as a spiritual being,
be it this life or earlier. In the past are times and instances that
hold us
back and prevent us from being who we really feel we should be, and
times which
prevent us from attaining our true potential. But with the application
of
Scientology a being can achieve find this past and eradicate those
mental and
spiritual blocks. For example, I used to run a construction business. I
could
only successfully run a building site consisting of 17 people. Any more
than
seemed to present too many problems. Then I started doing Scientology.
The
construction sites I could control got bigger and bigger. People were
happy on
my sites. There were no industrial problems, no accidents, no real
problems.
Tradesmen and contractors alike made money. Soon I was managing
projects with
200 people. My own IQ after doing Scientology had gone up 35 points. My
own
income went up 500%. At 32 years old I even bought a Rolls Royce car to
drive
to work. But after a while just having these great abilities for myself
was not
enough. Money did not seem to be that important any more. I was
attracted to
the idea of allowing others to achieve what I had Thus I chose to be a
Church
staff member and bring the miraculous gains of Scientology to others. Joe
mentions the Lisa McPherson case. She died of an undiagnosed air
embolism. This was unfortunate. She was involved in a car accident,
sent to a
hospital to get checked out, but the hospital said that she was fine.
With this
advice she went about her business at the Flag Service Organization in
Florida,
where she later died. In the USA 50,000 people die of air embolism each
year.
In Lisa's case it was tragic but not mysterious. And,
as to that organization called CAN. There are many people of many
faiths working in it. When people telephone CAN now about a religion
that they
know nothing about, those same people get referred to professional
religious
scholars who know about the religion concerned. These are not
Scientologists
they are being referred to. Those inquiring are being referred to
professionals
who know about the religion concerned. This provides a good service for
the
community. The old CAN was simply a religious hate group that served no
useful
purpose for the community. In
summary, yes, there are critics of Scientology. Many of them left the
organization at the time Joe Larabell did, or a bit later. Some critics
have
been caught up in upset generated others. All I can say for those who
left, is
that this was their choice. But the door into Scientology is never
fully closed
on them. But in saying this I should point out the sources of such
criticisms
are actually likely to be anti social type actions that the person has
done in
the past, not what has been done to him or her. And these actions are
not
necessarily easy for a person to confront again. For many it is simply
easier
to stay critical than to actually look at what one did in the past that
caused
him or her to become that way. This is a technical fact of the mind and
spirit
well known in Scientology. Like
any religion, people can leave Scientology. And if they chose to
leave, they should get on with their own lives, and let myself and
others
expand Scientology. I do not particularly want to have to pay a lot of
attention to critics. Perhaps such voices are like yapping dogs barking
at a
fire engine as it races past to put out a fire. Like
most people, I do not like my beliefs ridiculed. But I do respect
another person's point of view. I also respect intelligent
conversation. But
when that point of view or discussion becomes so loud that my own
survival as a
spiritual being is threatened, then it might be time for me to pay just
some
attention to those yapping dogs. So my request is to those dogs is to
find another
vehicle to bark at, and let myself and others put out the fire. And, if
they
cannot do that, then join us. And if they cannot join us, then be
silent. Nick
Broadhurst
Scientology:
The Fundamentals of Thought. |

